Goal:

The right tools for the right tasks, and how they interact.

We are actively using tools in a way that reduces cognitive load and makes it fluid and fast for us to work the way we want to.

Connected to the vision of how we want to work:

Daniel’s sketch:

Org Design Vision for a Collaborative Innovation Network

• Says that each project can use it’s own tools, so we can use a project as a sandbox
• But… @Andrea Gallagher thinks it will be easier to let more people contribute to a project if a project can share tool space with the whole DAO - we can post work to a bounty board and open up content as needed. So I think the tool suite chosen for the DAO will have a gravity well.

Tactical goals

• Bounties
  • Have tasks be available for qualified contributors and bounties
• Permissions
  • Have qualification be tied to other permission roles (e.g. access to evergreen content, discussion areas)
• Tasks in Work
  • Keep the task tracking where the content and work is
• Ease of Use
  • Have tools be easy to pick up and use
  • Not a barrier to participation

Success looks like:

• Core Team and Contributors are happy with the tools we are using
  • people not sensed a pain point or requested changes for a while
• the chosen tools are used by 90% of active RnDAO contributors
  • RnDAO Contributors =
  • active =
  • % =
  • used by =

Decision Model:

• need more than “safe to try” here. If we are experimenting with one, we need clear failure and success criteria
• Consent - This experiment is good enough that I think it will help us find the right tools

Proposals

DeWork and Test

Use DeWork with roles tied to Discord roles, but start experimenting with Clarity within . A task in DeWork gets a thread in Discord, can be