Learnings by date

Mar 28. google came back with some requests for our marketplace application. Cansy was working on that, maybe…but it is last step before we send it in. We’ll wait til we have it b4 spending time figuring out how to promote it.

Unfortunately the call with Scroll was moved to next week. good work by cansy creating the file with the side by side discourse view of the edit screen. i think this will be very helpful.

The Scenius call was scattered due to # of players. trig did a good job reeling everyone in. I think the idea of forever question on a 6 to 12 mo basis has traction but we’ll see. Next step if fill in Trig’s worksheet.

As the Discourse plug-in comes into view, will start reaching out to others again, that i reached out to before. Will talk to Daniel about this.

Mar 18, working with cansy on the pre-proposal chat with Eugene at Scroll. Cansy is going to create a demo of the original proposal vs SImscore/AI proposal as seen and working in Discourse. This will show Eugene the complete integration. I am going to create a response page in the Scroll Forum that shows the justification. Also need to think about if someone wants API in their own server.

Both RnDAO and Scenius are not easily being persuaded to use survey data as the beginning of their change management process. or Human-Centered Transformation Process according to Claude. I am waiting for Jonas to unpack the 2024 Retrospective….still waiting. Hopefully this will show more benefit to gokhan and roso. Shows the main sales issue of this project. Put it right in front of them and they choose something more complicated and slower. But this was always the case.

March 13, Major change in direction. It looks like a combo of statistical consensus and AI can product low noise output for DAO Proposal editing / justification and as well as action plans with justification. This helps with the what do I do with this, by moving it to the “do this” phase….the next question is “how do I do this?” I guess. Meeting with Ray K went well. He is no longer in the biz, but felt the approach had merit and is a must have in his former business role. Not clear how to sell it to them yet. Next major meeting is with Eugene at Scroll. Posted first SimScore/AI proposal and justification in zknation incentive propoasal.

Re: zknation: a delegate named Polar liked the AI proposal. POLAR zksynch Delegate

“This is a good proposal. For my tastes a little bureaucratic but if we must have bureaucracy at least it should be well thought out, which this seems to be. I especially like the incorporation of feedback.

My one quibble is the 100k ($7,000) requirement. This to my eye is basically a hidden form of centralisation in that it favours established delegates, OGs, professional DAO outfits/governerds and those from ‘developed’ nations. It sets a very high bar for newcomers of all forms.

@mcfly in an earlier post says: 'I think it should be a reasonable ratio relative to the Delegate rewards. 250k is probably too high, though we should denominate it in USD equivalent. Note that the idea was to allow delegates to accumulate required balance over first 6 months of DIP. ’

This seems reasonable but I don’t see it in the updated proposal. That at least gives people outside us usual suspects a chance to get skin in the game.”

March 4 There were a number of use cases for SimScore. The Venture Call survey by Roso. The scenius notion survey by Thomas and the 4th foundation survey by Daniel. There was also a Retrospective for RnDAO. Also provided reports to 2 Arbitrum projects. The Opco proposal and the Audit proposal. Tried using the Vitalik disposition curve. it is not direct enough. Also spoke to Juanrah…nice to have. a priority list.

In the venture call report, Roso said what do i do with this? In the scenius Thomas said “Paul’s not here to explain his thing”

So several things are clear. I need to change the course of this so that it is “must have”. And the report needs to “tell people what to do” with it.