RSE : Ch 2 : How we make decisions by Tudor & Simon | feenk 50% of time in software engineering is deciding what to do, rather than doing it.

Yes, incorporating decision hygiene into a project manager’s workflow could significantly improve their performance, especially in the context of large banks where decision-making is often complex and high-stakes. Here’s how decision hygiene could help:

1. Reducing Noise in Decision-Making

Project managers often face conflicting opinions and subjective judgments from stakeholders. Using decision hygiene principles like independent judgment and structured aggregation can:

• Minimize bias and noise in prioritizing tasks or resolving conflicts.
• Ensure decisions are based on collective wisdom rather than the loudest voices or hierarchy.

2. Improving Prioritization

Banks handle numerous simultaneous projects, and deciding which initiatives to prioritize is challenging. Decision hygiene tools, such as SimScore, could:

• Aggregate stakeholder input objectively to identify the most critical tasks or projects.
• Visualize priorities in a way that aligns all parties without extensive debates.

3. Facilitating Transparency

Decision hygiene emphasizes a clear, systematic process for how decisions are made, which:

• Helps project managers justify decisions to stakeholders and reduce pushback.
• Builds trust among cross-functional teams and senior leaders.

4. Enhancing Collaboration Without Groupthink

Project managers often facilitate discussions between diverse teams, where groupthink can occur. Decision hygiene can:

• Encourage independent input before group discussions, leading to a richer variety of perspectives.
• Prevent dominant voices from skewing the outcomes.

5. Managing Risks More Effectively